pletely arbitrary.
答案：错
14、The goal of an argument is to beat an opponent.
答案：错
15、Water is H2O, and salt is NaCl is an argument.
答案：商品
16、An argument can succeed in justifying its conclusion even if its audience rejects the argument’s premises.
答案：对
17、When an argument is used for persuasion, its purpose is to cause its audience to believe its conclusion.
答案：对
18、A justification tries to present a reason to believe its conclusion.
答案：对
第2章 单元测试
1、The word since is always a premise marker.
答案：错
2、If a word in a sentence can be replaced by a conclusion marker without significantly changing the meaning of the sentence, then the word is used as a conclusion marker in that sentence.
答案：对
3、Negative evaluative utterances say that something violates a standard.
答案：对
4、An assuring term is reflexive when it refers to the mental state of the speaker.
答案：对
5、The wordtooin too small introduces an evaluation.
答案：对
mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf by a butterfly or of a poisonous species by a palatable relative. However, ideal design is a lousy argument for evolution, for it mimics the postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the proof of evolutionpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf by a butterfly or of a poisonous species by a palatable relative. However, ideal design is a lousy argument for evolution, for it mimics the postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the proof of evolutionpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf by a butterfly or of a poisonous species by a palatable relative. However, ideal design is a lousy argument for evolution, for it mimics the postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the proof of evolutionpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf by a butterfly or of a poisonous species by a palatable relative. However, ideal design is a lousy argument for evolution, for it mimics the postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the proof of evolutionpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution mon ponents of ordinary floponents. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flomon theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf by a butterfly or of a poisonous species by a palatable relative. However, ideal design is a lousy argument for evolution, for it mimics the postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the proof of evolutionpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
返回栏目